Has the recruitment industry really changed?

As someone who has been living and breathing recruitment for nearly two decades, I have certainly seen the industry change. Now as to whether it’s been a change for the better or a change for the worse would depend on whether you’re talking to a recruiter, an employer or a candidate, since everyone would have a different story to tell.

Starting out as a recruiter in the mid 90’s I remember thinking how cool it was to be able to fax a résumé to a client. But then there were also times that weren’t so cool when I had to be in the office at 7:30am and still there at 7:30pm in case a client called in needing a temp for that day or the following morning. After all how else could they contact me? I wasn’t going to give them my home phone number! And then of course there times when my desk was covered in so many client files and candidate CVs that I couldn’t even find my rolodex if I tried!

Gosh how the recruitment world has changed.
Or has it?

Employers still want to deal with professional recruiters and to see the best candidates, candidates still want to deal with professional recruiters and to be represented for the best jobs, and the recruiters still want to be making the best matches.

So really nothing has changed … except of course for the way the whole recruitment process works.

Today hiring managers can scroll through CVs on their iPads (sorry what’s a fax?) in their office, at home or even on the bus; employers have their recruiters’ mobile numbers and email addresses stored in their mobile phones; candidate CVs have almost been replaced by the creation of a detailed LinkedIn profile and can be shared in the single click of a button; recruiters can ‘meet’ with candidates anywhere in the world virtually either via SKYPE or an on-line video interview platform; and new job openings can be fed straight into a candidate’s inbox via an online job board.

Long gone are the days of a recruiter having to wait on hold for half an hour before finally being able to dictate advertising copy to a customer service representative working in a call centre at the classifieds section of a local newspaper.

Yet while recruitment is now taking place at the speed of tomorrow, one thing that employers say has slowed down (or in some cases has disappeared entirely) is the concept of service. Even with all that technology has brought along with it – the social networks, mobile apps, video interview platforms, cloud-based candidate databases etc – if an employer decides to engage the services of a recruiter as opposed to undertaking the process on their own, then they want to be looked after. Employers want to be kept up to date at every stage of the process. They want recruiters to follow up, and to follow through.

Neither party in the so-called Recruitment Love Triangle (the employer, the recruiter or the candidate) should be comfortable hiding behind technology. It would be rare for a candidate to get a job without at least speaking to a recruiter or meeting with an employer face to face; Nor would an employer likely regularly use a recruiter with whom they only have an anonymous relationship over email.

I suppose it’s up to whether an employer is wanting a transactional relationship with their recruiter and a quick fix (bum on seat) solution to a hiring need, or whether they are looking for more of a consultative solution, and to build a long- term partnership with a recruiter who will help them grow their business, not just today but into the future.

When it comes to the world of recruitment, some things will never change.


Paul Slezak
February 2012.
Paul Slezak is Head of Community and Client Services with RecruitLoop. RecruitLoop gives employers a smarter way to recruit, with 80% cost savings: An online marketplace of experienced recruiters charging an hourly rate, and an online video interview platform.

 

Have you used Experience +

The Federal Government has long acknowledge the social and economic need to increase the workforce participation among mature age workers. One such initiative which was launched in 2010 to assist both employers and jobseekers in this area was the
Experience + website managed out of the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations (DEEWR).

The site provides various information relating to useful resources for jobseekers as well as employer related diversity toolkits and information pertaining to grants for employers of mature age workers (another issue for discussion at a later date!)

While everyone agrees the Government involvement is imperative in addressing not only age discrimination but also private sector engagement, how are these current initiatives being measured?

We recently contacted DEEWR to obtain some statistics on the success of the program and are still waiting for a response, however would love to hear your thoughts if you have had any experience – positive or negative – with Experience +

Here’s to Older Workers

Reblogged from AARP:

  • Click to visit the original post

Pop quiz: In December 2011, what was the unemployment rate for people 50 and over? The answer is 6.2 percent, nearly twice what it was at the beginning of the Great Recession in 2007. At AARP we often hear from members in their 50s, 60s and 70s who are unemployed and want and need to get back into the workforce…some desperately so. This month, AARP is shining the spotlight on older worker issues from a range of perspectives, from those who still need to work to have a roof over their heads, to those who …

Health Worker Survey – Macquarie University

 

Macquarie University is conducting research to understand the career stages of health workers and the career decisions of experienced health workers within allied health occupations. Adage have agreed to support this research by facilitating the researcher’s access to our members.

We ask you to consider volunteering for this research. The research will involve a survey which will take around 30 minutes to complete. You will be asked questions about your attitudes towards work and your career.

Please note your participation is voluntary and your responses will remain confidential between you and the researchers.

If you wish to participate in the survey please see the link below:

http://macquariefbe.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_a3LrvehisFHQzHe

Thank you, your participation is greatly appreciated.

Adage on Today Tonight

For anyone who saw the segment on Today Tonight addressing age discrimination and has  a positive or negative story to tell about their personal experiences feel free to email Heidi at heidi@adage.com.au

At Adage we are focussed on connecting with employers who value maturity and experience and hope to be able to make an impact in 2012. With new employers coming on board each week we hope to be able to deliver our jobseekers variety and a discriminatory free environment.

We also welcome feedback and robust debate about the mature age market so if you’d like to contribute to our blog get in touch through support@adage.com.au.

The more noise we make, the bigger impact we can have!

View the episode here

Age Discrimination Stats Released

Figures released by the Australian Bureau of Statistics highlight the pressures that face mature age workers in trying to stay in or re-enter the workforce, according to Age Discrimination Commissioner, Susan Ryan.

“The Bureau’s Job Search Experience Australia 2011 figures report that a staggering 18% of unemployed people aged 45 years and over found the main reason they had difficulty finding work was because they were considered too old by employers,” Commissioner Ryan said.

“In a country where we are constantly being told there are skills shortages, this finding is an indictment on the mindset of many people making recruitment decisions,” said Commissioner Ryan.

“It highlights that we have to move urgently away from the discriminatory thinking that 45 means people are ready for the employment scrap heap.”

Ms Ryan said there was absolutely no evidence that most older people – certainly not people aged as young as 45 – fell into the age-based stereotypes such as being slower, less technologically savvy, less flexible or less trainable.

“Instead of reinforcing the damaging stereotypes against mature age workers, employers should see the economic advantages of widening the pool for potential employees to include those older workers who are capable and experienced,” Commissioner Ryan said.

Ms Ryan said we need to celebrate as best practice those forward-thinking employers who demonstrate good, non-discriminatory employment policy and make productive use of all their workforce, regardless of age.

Source: Human Rights Commission

Why Hire Older Workers?

Hire a baby boomer today

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is a wide body of research to support the business case for hiring mature workers. Some of the most common arguments are outlined below:

  • Older workers deliver an average net benefit of $1,956 per year to their employer compared to the rest of the workforce – a result of increased retention, lower rates of absenteeism, decreased costs of recruitment and greater investment returns on training. (Business, Work and Ageing)
  • The 45-to-55 age bracket is the fastest growing labour market segment in Australia (AISR (2009), Experience Works).
  • Older workers aged 45+ will stay with an organisation 2.4 times longer on average than under 45s (AISR (2009), Experience Works).
  • Baby Boomers spend more time and money online than any other demographic (eMarketer).
  • 86% of Adage.com.au jobseekers said they would be more inclined to purchase products and services from organisations who were committed to hiring maturity (Adage Survey).
  • A 2006 ABS survey found that older workers were the least likely group to take days off due to their own illness or as a carer.

However I would be interested to hear people’s thoughts on the intangible benefits of hiring mature age workers. Why do you think employers should hire older workers?

Comments welcome